MQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of -26.62%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.74%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Castellum.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 438.042%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.20x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.47x versus 1.54x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 3.13%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Clearwater Analytics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $35.78 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Marqeta, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Marqeta.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are larger than Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues of $126.5M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.20x while Clearwater Analytics Holdings's PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.47x versus 15.87x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 17.05%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 21.91%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Jack Henry & Associates has an analysts' consensus of $190.05 which suggests that it could grow by 8.74%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.606%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jack Henry & Associates offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are smaller than Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues of $573.8M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $97.8M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.20x while Jack Henry & Associates's PE ratio is 31.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.47x versus 5.62x for Jack Henry & Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of -31.39%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $24.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.39%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Marqeta, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Marqeta.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are smaller than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $225.5M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.20x while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.47x versus 7.74x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.