CION Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 62.76% compared to CION Invt's net margin of 99.99%. CION Invt's return on equity of -1.84% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

CION Invt has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -1.77%. Given that CION Invt has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe CION Invt is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

CION Invt has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.035%.

CION Invt has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.2%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. CION Invt pays 263.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CION Invt's is not.

CION Invt quarterly revenues are -$39.6M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. CION Invt's net income of -$42.7M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, CION Invt's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CION Invt is 10.93x versus 8.43x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 62.76% compared to CION Invt's net margin of 91.13%. CION Invt's return on equity of -1.84% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

CION Invt has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.54%. Given that CION Invt has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe CION Invt is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

CION Invt has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.032%.

CION Invt has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.2%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. CION Invt pays 263.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CION Invt quarterly revenues are -$39.6M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. CION Invt's net income of -$42.7M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, CION Invt's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 12.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CION Invt is 10.93x versus 11.96x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 62.76% compared to CION Invt's net margin of 95.41%. CION Invt's return on equity of -1.84% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

CION Invt has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 13.82%. Given that CION Invt has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe CION Invt is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

CION Invt has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.59900000000001%.

CION Invt has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.2%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. CION Invt pays 263.94% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CION Invt quarterly revenues are -$39.6M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. CION Invt's net income of -$42.7M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, CION Invt's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CION Invt is 10.93x versus 9.14x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 62.76% compared to CION Invt's net margin of 90.2%. CION Invt's return on equity of -1.84% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

CION Invt has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could grow by 2.95%. Given that CION Invt has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe CION Invt is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

CION Invt has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.353%.

CION Invt has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.2%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. CION Invt pays 263.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CION Invt quarterly revenues are -$39.6M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. CION Invt's net income of -$42.7M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, CION Invt's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 105.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CION Invt is 10.93x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.