CE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of -2.94%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Dow's return on equity of 1.6%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 11.58%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $36.06 which suggests that it could grow by 30%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.609%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Dow offers a yield of 10.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Celanese's net income of -$21M is higher than Dow's net income of -$307M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Dow's PE ratio is 69.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 0.46x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of -12.12%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 11.58%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 107.33%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.602%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $601.5M. Celanese's net income of -$21M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 0.11x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hawkins has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of 6.66%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 11.58%. On the other hand Hawkins has an analysts' consensus of $148.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that Celanese has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Celanese is more attractive than Hawkins.

Celanese has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hawkins has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.907%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Hawkins offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins pays out 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hawkins quarterly revenues of $245.3M. Celanese's net income of -$21M is lower than Hawkins's net income of $16.3M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Hawkins's PE ratio is 33.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 2.87x for Hawkins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Celanese's net margin of 1.99%. Celanese's return on equity of -24.41% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $58.95, signalling upside risk potential of 11.58%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $145.37 which suggests that it could grow by 32.58%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.393%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Celanese pays -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Celanese's net income of -$21M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.03x while Nucor's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.58x versus 0.85x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.