CE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Celanese's net margin of 1.97%. Celanese's return on equity of 14.59% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.56%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $87.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.66%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $48.44 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that Celanese has higher upside potential than Dow, analysts believe Celanese is more attractive than Dow.

Celanese has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.995%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Dow offers a yield of 6.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Celanese pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 334.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Celanese's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.9B. Celanese's net income of $116M is lower than Dow's net income of $214M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.30x while Dow's PE ratio is 27.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.76x versus 0.67x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Celanese's net margin of 7.32%. Celanese's return on equity of 14.59% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $87.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.66%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $20.06 which suggests that it could grow by 95.54%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.309%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celanese pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Celanese's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $658.7M. Celanese's net income of $116M is higher than Green Plains's net income of $48.2M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.30x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.76x versus 0.26x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Celanese's net margin of 1.61%. Celanese's return on equity of 14.59% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $87.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.66%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.94%. Given that Celanese has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Celanese is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Celanese has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.878%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Celanese pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Celanese's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Celanese's net income of $116M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.30x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.76x versus 0.40x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Celanese's net margin of 3.36%. Celanese's return on equity of 14.59% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Celanese has a consensus price target of $87.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.66%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 25.04%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Celanese, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Celanese.

Celanese has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Celanese has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Celanese pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celanese quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Celanese's net income of $116M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Celanese's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.30x while Nucor's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celanese is 0.76x versus 0.96x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.