GPRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gevo has a net margin of -12.12% compared to Green Plains's net margin of -74.64%. Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81% beat Gevo's return on equity of -16.08%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.45%. On the other hand Gevo has an analysts' consensus of $5.42 which suggests that it could grow by 292.51%. Given that Gevo has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Gevo is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gevo has a beta of 2.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.642%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gevo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Gevo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $601.5M, which are larger than Gevo quarterly revenues of $29.1M. Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M is lower than Gevo's net income of -$21.7M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gevo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.16x versus 7.53x for Gevo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -12.12% compared to Green Plains's net margin of --. Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.45%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 125.37%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $601.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.16x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REX American Resources has a net margin of -12.12% compared to Green Plains's net margin of 5.48%. Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81% beat REX American Resources's return on equity of 9.07%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.45%. On the other hand REX American Resources has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than REX American Resources, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than REX American Resources.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REX American Resources has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.504%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REX American Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. REX American Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $601.5M, which are larger than REX American Resources quarterly revenues of $158.3M. Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M is lower than REX American Resources's net income of $8.7M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REX American Resources's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.16x versus 1.31x for REX American Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -12.12% compared to Green Plains's net margin of --. Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $8.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.45%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 125.23%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $601.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.16x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.