HWKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -10.69%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.25%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.19 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.907% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.859%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.61x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.92x versus 0.19x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrepid Potash has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 4.71%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Intrepid Potash's return on equity of -34.2%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.25%. On the other hand Intrepid Potash has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could fall by -41.91%. Given that Hawkins has higher upside potential than Intrepid Potash, analysts believe Hawkins is more attractive than Intrepid Potash.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.907% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrepid Potash has a beta of 1.757, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.654%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Intrepid Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Intrepid Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are larger than Intrepid Potash quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is higher than Intrepid Potash's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.61x while Intrepid Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.92x versus 1.71x for Intrepid Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Worldwide has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 3.7%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 11.85%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.25%. On the other hand Kronos Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.45%. Given that Kronos Worldwide has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Kronos Worldwide is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.907% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.666%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Kronos Worldwide offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide pays out 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues of $489.8M. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is lower than Kronos Worldwide's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.61x while Kronos Worldwide's PE ratio is 7.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.92x versus 0.38x for Kronos Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 4.97%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.28% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $148.33, signalling upside risk potential of 9.25%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.58%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.907% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hawkins pays 17.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $245.3M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Hawkins's net income of $16.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.61x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.92x versus 1.19x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.