ATEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 24.66% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of 11.84%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.09% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $22.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.46%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $214.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that A10 Networks has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe A10 Networks is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.483%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 35.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. A10 Networks's net income of $18.3M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.16x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 102.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 4.85x versus 15.08x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 24.66% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of 4.72%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.09% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $22.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.46%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.41%. Given that A10 Networks has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe A10 Networks is more attractive than ePlus.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.16%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 35.5% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. A10 Networks's net income of $18.3M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.16x while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 4.85x versus 0.81x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 24.66% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of 4.41%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.09% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $22.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.46%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.39%. Given that A10 Networks has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe A10 Networks is more attractive than Red Violet.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.629, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.902%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. A10 Networks pays 35.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. A10 Networks's net income of $18.3M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.16x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 73.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 4.85x versus 6.99x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 24.66% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of -5.04%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.09% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $22.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.46%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than A10 Networks, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than A10 Networks.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.291%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 35.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. A10 Networks's net income of $18.3M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.16x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 4.85x versus 0.31x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.