RDVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Red Violet's net margin of 16.4%. Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.08%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $203.07 which suggests that it could grow by 13.13%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.925%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Red Violet's net income of $1.7M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.47x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 46.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 7.16x versus 15.38x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Red Violet's net margin of 6.08%. Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.08%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.22%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Red Violet's net income of $1.7M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.47x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 7.16x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Red Violet's net margin of -4.06%. Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.08%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.51 which suggests that it could grow by 20.77%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.754%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.1M. Red Violet's net income of $1.7M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.47x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 7.16x versus 5.40x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Red Violet's net margin of -2.6%. Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.08%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -35.63%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Upland Software.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Red Violet's net income of $1.7M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.47x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 7.16x versus 0.49x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.