PLUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of 11.45%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.85%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.90 which suggests that it could grow by 10.13%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

ePlus has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.467%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 109.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 15.36x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of 15.63%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.85%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Red Violet.

ePlus has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 78.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 8.65x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of -9.59%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.85%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.85 which suggests that it could grow by 14.37%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

ePlus has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.678%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 4.17x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 5.06% compared to ePlus's net margin of -40.61%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.46% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $92.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.85%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 96.76%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ePlus.

ePlus has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. ePlus's net income of $25.2M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.92x versus 0.22x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.