ARMK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dover has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Aramark's net margin of 17.5%. Aramark's return on equity of 8.48% beat Dover's return on equity of 29.77%.

Aramark has a consensus price target of $44.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.31%. On the other hand Dover has an analysts' consensus of $214.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Aramark has higher upside potential than Dover, analysts believe Aramark is more attractive than Dover.

Aramark has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dover has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.334%.

Aramark has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Dover offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Aramark pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Dover pays out 26.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aramark quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Dover quarterly revenues of $2B. Aramark's net income of $122.4M is lower than Dover's net income of $347.1M. Notably, Aramark's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while Dover's PE ratio is 17.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aramark is 0.60x versus 3.05x for Dover. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Foods Group has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Aramark's net margin of --. Aramark's return on equity of 8.48% beat First Foods Group's return on equity of --.

Aramark has a consensus price target of $44.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.31%. On the other hand First Foods Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aramark has higher upside potential than First Foods Group, analysts believe Aramark is more attractive than First Foods Group.

Aramark has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Foods Group has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.157%.

Aramark has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. First Foods Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aramark pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. First Foods Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aramark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aramark quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than First Foods Group quarterly revenues of --. Aramark's net income of $122.4M is higher than First Foods Group's net income of --. Notably, Aramark's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while First Foods Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aramark is 0.60x versus -- for First Foods Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JB Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Aramark's net margin of 4.94%. Aramark's return on equity of 8.48% beat JB Hunt Transport Services's return on equity of 14.02%.

Aramark has a consensus price target of $44.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.31%. On the other hand JB Hunt Transport Services has an analysts' consensus of $192.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.42%. Given that Aramark has higher upside potential than JB Hunt Transport Services, analysts believe Aramark is more attractive than JB Hunt Transport Services.

Aramark has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JB Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.338%.

Aramark has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. JB Hunt Transport Services offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Aramark pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. JB Hunt Transport Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aramark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aramark quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than JB Hunt Transport Services quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Aramark's net income of $122.4M is lower than JB Hunt Transport Services's net income of $155.5M. Notably, Aramark's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while JB Hunt Transport Services's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aramark is 0.60x versus 1.47x for JB Hunt Transport Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuitive Machines has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Aramark's net margin of -94.74%. Aramark's return on equity of 8.48% beat Intuitive Machines's return on equity of --.

Aramark has a consensus price target of $44.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.31%. On the other hand Intuitive Machines has an analysts' consensus of $18.40 which suggests that it could fall by -0.59%. Given that Aramark has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Aramark is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Aramark has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.608% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aramark has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Intuitive Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aramark pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines pays out 12.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aramark quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues of $58.5M. Aramark's net income of $122.4M is higher than Intuitive Machines's net income of -$55.4M. Notably, Aramark's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while Intuitive Machines's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aramark is 0.60x versus 4.40x for Intuitive Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.