LUNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of -94.74% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -32.78%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -- beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -23.72%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $16.70, signalling downside risk potential of -8.04%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.31 which suggests that it could grow by 13.86%. Given that Planet Labs PBC has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Planet Labs PBC is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays 12.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $58.5M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $61.3M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$55.4M is lower than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$20.1M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.31x versus 4.84x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMMO has a net margin of -94.74% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -22.81%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -- beat AMMO's return on equity of -5.99%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $16.70, signalling downside risk potential of -8.04%. On the other hand AMMO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.55%. Given that AMMO has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe AMMO is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMMO has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.173%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMMO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays 12.66% of its earnings as a dividend. AMMO pays out -19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $58.5M, which are larger than AMMO quarterly revenues of $31M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$55.4M is lower than AMMO's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while AMMO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.31x versus 0.92x for AMMO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of -94.74% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -49.56%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -- beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -37.75%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $16.70, signalling downside risk potential of -8.04%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $23.27 which suggests that it could fall by -8.63%. Given that Rocket Lab USA has more downside risk than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Intuitive Machines is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays 12.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $58.5M, which are smaller than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $104.8M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$55.4M is lower than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$51.9M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.31x versus 34.46x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space has a net margin of -94.74% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -208.81%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -- beat Sidus Space's return on equity of -137.36%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $16.70, signalling downside risk potential of -8.04%. On the other hand Sidus Space has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 104.08%. Given that Sidus Space has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Sidus Space is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays 12.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $58.5M, which are larger than Sidus Space quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$55.4M is lower than Sidus Space's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Sidus Space's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.31x versus 1.22x for Sidus Space. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.