ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -189.45%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $220.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.47%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.771%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.35x versus 2.20x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 11.5%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 31.44%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $220.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.47%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $459.29 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Deere &.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.054%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.35x versus 2.32x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 8.22%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 14%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $220.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.47%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $132.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.078%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $155M. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.35x versus 2.15x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -4.07%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Titan International's return on equity of -1.73%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $220.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.47%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 76.73%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.693% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.818, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.782%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $448M. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$18.2M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Titan International's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.35x versus 0.25x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.