ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -149.77%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -33%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.37%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.522%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $713.5K. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.49x versus 2.00x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 10.52%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.37%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $534.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.76%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Deere &.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.499%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 22.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.49x versus 2.99x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 14.21%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.37%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.74%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.975%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.49x versus 2.33x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.37%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 670.66%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.024, which suggesting that the stock is 2.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.597%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.49x versus 0.07x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.