ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -149.77%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -33%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.962%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $713.5K. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.61x versus 2.36x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 14.4%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $547.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that Deere & has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Deere & is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.375%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 25.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.61x versus 3.18x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 14.21%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.99%. Given that Lindsay has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Lindsay is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.982%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.61x versus 2.30x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.49% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $213.50, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 708.26%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.078% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.495%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $391M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $31.8M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.20x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.61x versus 0.07x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.