ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -189.45%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.23%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0049999999999994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.66x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.33x versus 2.34x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 10.52%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.23%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $492.61 which suggests that it could grow by 2.96%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Deere &.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0049999999999994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.33000000000001%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.66x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.33x versus 2.80x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 10.32%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.23%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.16%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0049999999999994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.23%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $166.3M. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $17.2M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.66x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.33x versus 2.29x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 7.29% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $203.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.23%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $3.57 which suggests that it could grow by 782.84%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0049999999999994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.174%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $385.3M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.66x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.33x versus 0.08x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.