LNN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group has a net margin of 10.32% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 7.29%. Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26% beat Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.36%. On the other hand Alamo Group has an analysts' consensus of $203.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.34%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.103%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Alamo Group offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group pays out 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Alamo Group quarterly revenues of $385.3M. Lindsay's net income of $17.2M is lower than Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while Alamo Group's PE ratio is 19.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.35x versus 1.38x for Alamo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 10.32% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 10.52%. Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.36%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $492.57 which suggests that it could grow by 2.68%. Given that Lindsay has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Lindsay is more attractive than Deere &.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.365%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Lindsay's net income of $17.2M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 21.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.35x versus 2.81x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Toro has a net margin of 10.32% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 5.31%. Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26% beat The Toro's return on equity of 25.89%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.36%. On the other hand The Toro has an analysts' consensus of $91.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.58%. Given that The Toro has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe The Toro is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toro has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.342%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. The Toro offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than The Toro quarterly revenues of $995M. Lindsay's net income of $17.2M is lower than The Toro's net income of $52.8M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while The Toro's PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.35x versus 1.69x for The Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 10.32% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 0.35%. Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26% beat Titan International's return on equity of -0.99%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.36%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.51%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, which suggesting that the stock is 29.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.099%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $383.6M. Lindsay's net income of $17.2M is higher than Titan International's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.35x versus 0.33x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.