CEAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agrify has a net margin of -149.77% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -302.23%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -33% beat Agrify's return on equity of -402.52%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Agrify has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3170.35%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agrify has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agrify offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agrify pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $713.5K, which are larger than Agrify quarterly revenues of $538K. CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Agrify's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agrify's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 1.90x versus 4.87x for Agrify. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -149.77% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -1.09%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -33% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 6.19%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 288.89%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.34%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $713.5K, which are smaller than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $5.1M. CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of -$55.8K. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 13.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 1.90x versus 0.38x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -149.77% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -35.49%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -33% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 74.45%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $713.5K, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $40.5M. CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 1.90x versus 0.10x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -149.77% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -13.78%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -33% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 714.45%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.597%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $713.5K, which are smaller than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 1.90x versus 0.07x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.