CEAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agrify has a net margin of -189.45% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -1130.87%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82% beat Agrify's return on equity of -1185.63%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Agrify has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5067.96%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.663% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agrify has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agrify offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agrify pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $390.8K, which are smaller than Agrify quarterly revenues of $2.2M. CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K is higher than Agrify's net income of -$24.4M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agrify's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 2.34x versus 2.15x for Agrify. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -189.45% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of 13.48%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 2.68%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 360.53%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.663% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.637%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $390.8K, which are smaller than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.2M. CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of $831.9K. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 30.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 2.34x versus 0.31x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -189.45% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -46.93%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -25.85%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 255.33%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.663% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $390.8K, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $37.3M. CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 2.34x versus 0.05x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -189.45% compared to CEA Industries's net margin of -13.78%. CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

CEA Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $3.57 which suggests that it could grow by 731.39%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than CEA Industries.

CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, which suggesting that the stock is 23.663% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.174%.

CEA Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEA Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEA Industries quarterly revenues are $390.8K, which are smaller than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, CEA Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEA Industries is 2.34x versus 0.09x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.