Why Did Ken Griffin Buy Sweetgreen Stock?
In Q1, Ken Griffin’s Citadel Advisors purchased nearly 1.3 million…
Sell
41
ITP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.20
Seasonality move
:
-12.12%
Day range:
$0.19 - $0.23
52-week range:
$0.15 - $1.07
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.03x
P/B ratio:
0.02x
Volume:
3.8M
Avg. volume:
11.8M
1-year change:
-3.3%
Market cap:
$3.7M
Revenue:
$75.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$527M | $0.59 | 8.08% | -73.89% | $22.67 |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$800.1M | $0.60 | 1.72% | 287.71% | $69.00 |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -33.33% | $1.40 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -100% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$0.22 | -- | $3.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$19.12 | $22.67 | $1.8B | 16.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$17.06 | -- | $118.9M | 21.06x | $0.04 | 0.94% | 0.26x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$78.20 | $69.00 | $1.3B | 29.29x | $0.77 | 3.94% | 0.42x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
$0.59 | $1.40 | $42.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
$0.69 | $1.50 | $57M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
5.98% | -4.657 | 352.64% | 0.93x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
39.92% | 1.320 | 28.46% | 0.54x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
20.34% | 0.009 | 30.78% | 0.78x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
57.93% | 1.486 | 106.4% | 1.17x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | 0.662 | -- | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | 0.347 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
|
$84.1K | -$3.4M | -5.62% | -5.99% | -30.93% | -$2.5M |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum
|
$60.6M | $46.1M | 10.58% | 18.99% | 6.17% | $51.1M |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$8.1M | -$1.6M | 3.41% | 4.48% | -0.98% | $1.6M |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
|
$104M | $43.2M | 2.54% | 6.41% | 5.15% | $18.8M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-$185.4K | -$2.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.6M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-$7K | -$736K | -- | -- | -- | -$598K |
IT Tech Packaging vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ITP or CENX?
Century Aluminum has a net margin of -32.15% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of 4.69%. IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M CENXCentury Aluminum9.56% $0.29 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ITP or CENX?
IT Tech Packaging has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 CENXCentury Aluminum2 0 0 -
Is ITP or CENX More Risky?
IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 199.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.539%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ITP or CENX?
IT Tech Packaging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IT Tech Packaging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ITP or CENX?
IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues are $10.9M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, IT Tech Packaging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 16.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IT Tech Packaging is 0.03x versus 0.78x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M CENXCentury Aluminum0.78x 16.48x $633.9M $29.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ITP or FRD?
Friedman Industries has a net margin of -32.15% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of -1.23%. IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M FRDFriedman Industries8.6% -$0.17 $159.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ITP or FRD?
IT Tech Packaging has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IT Tech Packaging has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe IT Tech Packaging is more attractive than Friedman Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 FRDFriedman Industries0 0 0 -
Is ITP or FRD More Risky?
IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 199.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.509, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.9%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ITP or FRD?
IT Tech Packaging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. IT Tech Packaging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ITP or FRD?
IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues are $10.9M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, IT Tech Packaging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IT Tech Packaging is 0.03x versus 0.26x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M FRDFriedman Industries0.26x 21.06x $94.1M -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ITP or KALU?
Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -32.15% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of 2.78%. IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M KALUKaiser Aluminum13.38% $1.31 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About ITP or KALU?
IT Tech Packaging has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.77%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 KALUKaiser Aluminum1 2 0 -
Is ITP or KALU More Risky?
IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 199.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.302%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ITP or KALU?
IT Tech Packaging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. IT Tech Packaging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ITP or KALU?
IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues are $10.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, IT Tech Packaging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IT Tech Packaging is 0.03x versus 0.42x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M KALUKaiser Aluminum0.42x 29.29x $777.4M $21.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ITP or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -32.15% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of --. IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -$0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ITP or PZG?
IT Tech Packaging has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 136.57%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada1 0 0 -
Is ITP or PZG More Risky?
IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 199.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ITP or PZG?
IT Tech Packaging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IT Tech Packaging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ITP or PZG?
IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues are $10.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, IT Tech Packaging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IT Tech Packaging is 0.03x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -- -- -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ITP or XPL?
Solitario Resources has a net margin of -32.15% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of --. IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.99% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ITPIT Tech Packaging0.77% -$0.35 $162.5M XPLSolitario Resources-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ITP or XPL?
IT Tech Packaging has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.36%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ITPIT Tech Packaging0 0 0 XPLSolitario Resources0 0 0 -
Is ITP or XPL More Risky?
IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 199.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ITP or XPL?
IT Tech Packaging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IT Tech Packaging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ITP or XPL?
IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues are $10.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, IT Tech Packaging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IT Tech Packaging is 0.03x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ITPIT Tech Packaging0.03x -- $10.9M -$3.5M XPLSolitario Resources-- -- -- -$511K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Planet Labs’ Stock Go Next?
On 4 June 2025 Planet reported Q1 FY 2026 revenue of $66.3 million, up 10% year over…
Where Will VICI Properties Be in 5 Years?
VICI Properties (NYSE:VICI) is a real estate investment trust focused…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
73
OKLO alert for Jun 12
Oklo [OKLO] is down 5.6% over the past day.
Buy
87
SMR alert for Jun 12
NuScale Power [SMR] is down 2.96% over the past day.
Buy
53
PLAY alert for Jun 12
Dave & Buster's Entertainment [PLAY] is up 0.69% over the past day.
