WDFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 12.33% compared to WD-40's net margin of -1.23%. WD-40's return on equity of 31.98% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.65%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $153.5M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. WD-40's net income of $18.9M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.34x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innospec has a net margin of 12.33% compared to WD-40's net margin of -15.08%. WD-40's return on equity of 31.98% beat Innospec's return on equity of 2.97%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.65%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of $131.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.85%. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.631%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Innospec's is not.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $153.5M, which are smaller than Innospec quarterly revenues of $466.8M. WD-40's net income of $18.9M is higher than Innospec's net income of -$70.4M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Innospec's PE ratio is 69.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.34x versus 1.32x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 12.33% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 31.98% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.65%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 230.58%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $153.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $18.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.34x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 12.33% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 31.98% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.65%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.52%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $153.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $18.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.34x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.