IOSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Balchem has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of 13.99%. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Balchem's return on equity of 11.53%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $131.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.85%. On the other hand Balchem has an analysts' consensus of $199.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.72%. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Balchem, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Balchem.

Innospec has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.631% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Balchem has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.287%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Balchem offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem pays out 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Innospec's is not.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Balchem quarterly revenues of $240M. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Balchem's net income of $33.6M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.14x while Balchem's PE ratio is 42.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.32x versus 5.71x for Balchem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of -1.23%. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $131.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.85%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Innospec has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.631% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Innospec's is not.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.14x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.32x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $131.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.85%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 230.58%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.631% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.14x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.32x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $131.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.85%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.52%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.631% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.14x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.32x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.