TFSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 24.24% compared to TFS Financial's net margin of 5.97%. TFS Financial's return on equity of 4.2% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 1.15%.

TFS Financial has a consensus price target of $14.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.91%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TFS Financial has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe TFS Financial is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

TFS Financial has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.609% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.879%.

TFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.03%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TFS Financial pays 74.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TFS Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TFS Financial quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.7M. TFS Financial's net income of $18.2M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of $522K. Notably, TFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.33x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 26.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TFS Financial is 11.52x versus 1.71x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of 24.24% compared to TFS Financial's net margin of -32.12%. TFS Financial's return on equity of 4.2% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity of -10.51%.

TFS Financial has a consensus price target of $14.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.91%. On the other hand Carver Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15942.77%. Given that Carver Bancorp has higher upside potential than TFS Financial, analysts believe Carver Bancorp is more attractive than TFS Financial.

TFS Financial has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.609% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.489%.

TFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.03%. Carver Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TFS Financial pays 74.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TFS Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TFS Financial quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.6M. TFS Financial's net income of $18.2M is higher than Carver Bancorp's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, TFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.33x while Carver Bancorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TFS Financial is 11.52x versus 0.35x for Carver Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 24.24% compared to TFS Financial's net margin of 25.1%. TFS Financial's return on equity of 4.2% beat Pathward Financial's return on equity of 22.6%.

TFS Financial has a consensus price target of $14.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.91%. On the other hand Pathward Financial has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that TFS Financial has higher upside potential than Pathward Financial, analysts believe TFS Financial is more attractive than Pathward Financial.

TFS Financial has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.609% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.797%.

TFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.03%. Pathward Financial offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. TFS Financial pays 74.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TFS Financial quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Pathward Financial quarterly revenues of $133.9M. TFS Financial's net income of $18.2M is lower than Pathward Financial's net income of $33.6M. Notably, TFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.33x while Pathward Financial's PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TFS Financial is 11.52x versus 3.10x for Pathward Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a net margin of 24.24% compared to TFS Financial's net margin of 26.35%. TFS Financial's return on equity of 4.2% beat Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of -0.36%.

TFS Financial has a consensus price target of $14.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.91%. On the other hand Pacific Premier Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.95%. Given that Pacific Premier Bancorp has higher upside potential than TFS Financial, analysts believe Pacific Premier Bancorp is more attractive than TFS Financial.

TFS Financial has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.609% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.267, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.651%.

TFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.03%. Pacific Premier Bancorp offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. TFS Financial pays 74.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays out 409.26% of its earnings as a dividend. TFS Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pacific Premier Bancorp's is not.

TFS Financial quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues of $136.6M. TFS Financial's net income of $18.2M is lower than Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M. Notably, TFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.33x while Pacific Premier Bancorp's PE ratio is 170.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TFS Financial is 11.52x versus 6.89x for Pacific Premier Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.