PPBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 26.35% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 5.97%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of -0.36% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 1.15%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.23%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Premier Bancorp has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe Pacific Premier Bancorp is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.879%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 409.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of $522K. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 170.92x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 26.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 6.99x versus 1.72x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chain Bridge Bancorp has a net margin of 26.35% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 44.76%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of -0.36% beat Chain Bridge Bancorp's return on equity of 22.2%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.23%. On the other hand Chain Bridge Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.66%. Given that Chain Bridge Bancorp has higher upside potential than Pacific Premier Bancorp, analysts believe Chain Bridge Bancorp is more attractive than Pacific Premier Bancorp.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chain Bridge Bancorp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Chain Bridge Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 409.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Chain Bridge Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than Chain Bridge Bancorp quarterly revenues of $16.7M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than Chain Bridge Bancorp's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 170.92x while Chain Bridge Bancorp's PE ratio is 7.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 6.99x versus 3.12x for Chain Bridge Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OceanFirst Financial has a net margin of 26.35% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 26.23%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of -0.36% beat OceanFirst Financial's return on equity of 6.35%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.23%. On the other hand OceanFirst Financial has an analysts' consensus of $21.93 which suggests that it could grow by 21.02%. Given that OceanFirst Financial has higher upside potential than Pacific Premier Bancorp, analysts believe OceanFirst Financial is more attractive than Pacific Premier Bancorp.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OceanFirst Financial has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.636%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. OceanFirst Financial offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 409.26% of its earnings as a dividend. OceanFirst Financial pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. OceanFirst Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pacific Premier Bancorp's is not.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than OceanFirst Financial quarterly revenues of $95.8M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than OceanFirst Financial's net income of $25.1M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 170.92x while OceanFirst Financial's PE ratio is 10.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 6.99x versus 2.76x for OceanFirst Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TFS Financial has a net margin of 26.35% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 24.24%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of -0.36% beat TFS Financial's return on equity of 4.2%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.23%. On the other hand TFS Financial has an analysts' consensus of $14.75 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that TFS Financial has higher upside potential than Pacific Premier Bancorp, analysts believe TFS Financial is more attractive than Pacific Premier Bancorp.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.267, which suggesting that the stock is 26.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TFS Financial has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.609%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. TFS Financial offers a yield of 9.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 409.26% of its earnings as a dividend. TFS Financial pays out 74.07% of its earnings as a dividend. TFS Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pacific Premier Bancorp's is not.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than TFS Financial quarterly revenues of $75.1M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than TFS Financial's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 170.92x while TFS Financial's PE ratio is 46.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 6.99x versus 11.54x for TFS Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.