PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 22.69%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $71.49 which suggests that it could grow by 14.42%. Given that Comerica has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Comerica is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, which suggesting that the stock is 28.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.918%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.69x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.50x versus 2.61x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 16.32%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.19%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, which suggesting that the stock is 28.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.69x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.50x versus 2.87x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Hawaiian has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 30.55%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand First Hawaiian has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 1.83%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, which suggesting that the stock is 28.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.827%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. First Hawaiian offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. First Hawaiian pays out 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than First Hawaiian quarterly revenues of $201.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.69x while First Hawaiian's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.50x versus 4.17x for First Hawaiian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 27.77%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, which suggesting that the stock is 28.885% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Park National offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.69x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.50x versus 5.66x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.