FHB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bank of Hawaii has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 25.06%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.43%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Bank of Hawaii has an analysts' consensus of $70.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.77%. Given that First Hawaiian has higher upside potential than Bank of Hawaii, analysts believe First Hawaiian is more attractive than Bank of Hawaii.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.032%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Bank of Hawaii offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Hawaii pays out 69.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues of $161M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Bank of Hawaii's net income of $40.4M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Bank of Hawaii's PE ratio is 21.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.11x versus 4.40x for Bank of Hawaii. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 20.37%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.69%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.079%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $65.3M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.11x versus 3.01x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 16.32%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.11x versus 2.83x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plumas Bancorp has a net margin of 30.55% compared to First Hawaiian's net margin of 37.28%. First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97% beat Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3%.

First Hawaiian has a consensus price target of $26.38, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Plumas Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $52.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.885%.

First Hawaiian has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Plumas Bancorp offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. First Hawaiian pays 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp pays out 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Hawaiian quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues of $21M. First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M is higher than Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M. Notably, First Hawaiian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.59x while Plumas Bancorp's PE ratio is 9.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Hawaiian is 4.11x versus 4.32x for Plumas Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.