PHUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -415.04% compared to Phunware's net margin of 17.52%. Phunware's return on equity of -289.92% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Phunware has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 92.43%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $328.59 which suggests that it could grow by 12.74%. Given that Phunware has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Phunware is more attractive than Autodesk.

Phunware has a beta of 2.277, which suggesting that the stock is 127.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.199%.

Phunware has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phunware pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phunware quarterly revenues are $665K, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Phunware's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Phunware's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 57.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phunware is 11.43x versus 10.60x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -415.04% compared to Phunware's net margin of -9.14%. Phunware's return on equity of -289.92% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Phunware has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 92.43%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 113.44%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Phunware, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Phunware.

Phunware has a beta of 2.277, which suggesting that the stock is 127.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Phunware has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phunware pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phunware quarterly revenues are $665K, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Phunware's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Phunware's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phunware is 11.43x versus 0.79x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -415.04% compared to Phunware's net margin of -6.7%. Phunware's return on equity of -289.92% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Phunware has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 92.43%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.79%. Given that Phunware has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Phunware is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Phunware has a beta of 2.277, which suggesting that the stock is 127.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Phunware has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phunware pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phunware quarterly revenues are $665K, which are smaller than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Phunware's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Phunware's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phunware is 11.43x versus 1.22x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rumble has a net margin of -415.04% compared to Phunware's net margin of -125.87%. Phunware's return on equity of -289.92% beat Rumble's return on equity of -59.7%.

Phunware has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 92.43%. On the other hand Rumble has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Phunware has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe Phunware is more attractive than Rumble.

Phunware has a beta of 2.277, which suggesting that the stock is 127.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rumble has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Phunware has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rumble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phunware pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rumble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phunware quarterly revenues are $665K, which are smaller than Rumble quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Phunware's net income of -$2.8M is higher than Rumble's net income of -$31.5M. Notably, Phunware's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rumble's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phunware is 11.43x versus 30.61x for Rumble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.