ISDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -6.7% compared to Issuer Direct's net margin of 17.52%. Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Issuer Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.77%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Autodesk.

Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

Issuer Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Issuer Direct pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Issuer Direct quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Issuer Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.67x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Issuer Direct is 1.18x versus 10.95x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -6.7% compared to Issuer Direct's net margin of 2%. Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 42.17%.

Issuer Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.77%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Agilysys.

Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.042%.

Issuer Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Issuer Direct pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Issuer Direct quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $68.3M. Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K is lower than Agilysys's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Issuer Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.67x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 39.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Issuer Direct is 1.18x versus 15.19x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -6.7% compared to Issuer Direct's net margin of -9.14%. Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Issuer Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.77%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 141.24%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Issuer Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Issuer Direct pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Issuer Direct quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Issuer Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.67x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Issuer Direct is 1.18x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logility Supply Chain Solutions has a net margin of -6.7% compared to Issuer Direct's net margin of 6.87%. Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74% beat Logility Supply Chain Solutions's return on equity of 7.66%.

Issuer Direct has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 44.77%. On the other hand Logility Supply Chain Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $15.67 which suggests that it could grow by 43.21%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Logility Supply Chain Solutions, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Logility Supply Chain Solutions.

Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logility Supply Chain Solutions has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.543%.

Issuer Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logility Supply Chain Solutions offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Issuer Direct pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logility Supply Chain Solutions pays out 131.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

Issuer Direct quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Logility Supply Chain Solutions quarterly revenues of $25.3M. Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K is lower than Logility Supply Chain Solutions's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Issuer Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.67x while Logility Supply Chain Solutions's PE ratio is 57.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Issuer Direct is 1.18x versus 3.57x for Logility Supply Chain Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.