PAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Callan Jmb has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics's net margin of --. Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76% beat Callan Jmb's return on equity of --.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 69.56%. On the other hand Callan Jmb has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics has higher upside potential than Callan Jmb, analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics is more attractive than Callan Jmb.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Callan Jmb has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Callan Jmb offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Callan Jmb pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues are $95.2M, which are larger than Callan Jmb quarterly revenues of --. Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$3.2M is higher than Callan Jmb's net income of --. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Callan Jmb's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics is 0.34x versus -- for Callan Jmb. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics's net margin of -157.13%. Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -44.91%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 69.56%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3403.65%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Proficient Auto Logistics, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Proficient Auto Logistics.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues are $95.2M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of $479.8K. Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$753.9K. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics is 0.34x versus 4.46x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lakeside Holding has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics's net margin of -28.16%. Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76% beat Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -300.55%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 69.56%. On the other hand Lakeside Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding, analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics is more attractive than Lakeside Holding.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lakeside Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeside Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues are $95.2M, which are larger than Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Lakeside Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics is 0.34x versus 0.42x for Lakeside Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics's net margin of 1.19%. Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a consensus price target of $14.67, signalling upside risk potential of 69.56%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.93%. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proficient Auto Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues are $95.2M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Proficient Auto Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.41x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 16.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proficient Auto Logistics is 0.34x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.