LSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of -28.16% compared to Lakeside Holding's net margin of -157.13%. Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -300.55% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -44.91%.

Lakeside Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3210.35%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Lakeside Holding.

Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of $479.8K. Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$753.9K. Notably, Lakeside Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding is 0.40x versus 4.46x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a net margin of -28.16% compared to Lakeside Holding's net margin of -3.35%. Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -300.55% beat Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76%.

Lakeside Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Proficient Auto Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 88.51%. Given that Proficient Auto Logistics has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding, analysts believe Proficient Auto Logistics is more attractive than Lakeside Holding.

Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proficient Auto Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proficient Auto Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues of $95.2M. Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Lakeside Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proficient Auto Logistics's PE ratio is 111.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding is 0.40x versus 0.34x for Proficient Auto Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -28.16% compared to Lakeside Holding's net margin of 1.19%. Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -300.55% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

Lakeside Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.33%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Lakeside Holding.

Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Lakeside Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Lakeside Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding is 0.40x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volato Group has a net margin of -28.16% compared to Lakeside Holding's net margin of 1.79%. Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -300.55% beat Volato Group's return on equity of --.

Lakeside Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volato Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lakeside Holding has higher upside potential than Volato Group, analysts believe Lakeside Holding is more attractive than Volato Group.

Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volato Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lakeside Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volato Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeside Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volato Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Volato Group quarterly revenues of $25.5M. Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Volato Group's net income of $455K. Notably, Lakeside Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Volato Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeside Holding is 0.40x versus 0.11x for Volato Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.