CTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lakeside Holding has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -54.15%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69% beat Lakeside Holding's return on equity of -240.29%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3578.16%. On the other hand Lakeside Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Lakeside Holding, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Lakeside Holding.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeside Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lakeside Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeside Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are -$1.4M, which are smaller than Lakeside Holding quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Lakeside Holding's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Lakeside Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 4.22x versus 0.39x for Lakeside Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proficient Auto Logistics has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -1.49%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69% beat Proficient Auto Logistics's return on equity of 1.76%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3578.16%. On the other hand Proficient Auto Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $15.67 which suggests that it could grow by 92.94%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Proficient Auto Logistics, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Proficient Auto Logistics.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proficient Auto Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proficient Auto Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are -$1.4M, which are smaller than Proficient Auto Logistics quarterly revenues of $91.5M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Proficient Auto Logistics's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Proficient Auto Logistics's PE ratio is 111.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 4.22x versus 0.34x for Proficient Auto Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of 2.45%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3578.16%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.4%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are -$1.4M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 4.22x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volato Group has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of --. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69% beat Volato Group's return on equity of --.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3578.16%. On the other hand Volato Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Volato Group, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Volato Group.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volato Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volato Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volato Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are -$1.4M, which are larger than Volato Group quarterly revenues of --. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Volato Group's net income of --. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Volato Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 4.22x versus 0.04x for Volato Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.