MCHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of -17.38% compared to Marchex's net margin of 38.84%. Marchex's return on equity of -16.35% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 229.75%.

Marchex has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.22%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $461.65 which suggests that it could grow by 26.66%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than AppLovin.

Marchex has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marchex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marchex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marchex quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Marchex's net income of -$2M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $576.4M. Notably, Marchex's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AppLovin's PE ratio is 65.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marchex is 1.85x versus 24.62x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Integral Ad Science Holding has a net margin of -17.38% compared to Marchex's net margin of 5.96%. Marchex's return on equity of -16.35% beat Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8%.

Marchex has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.22%. On the other hand Integral Ad Science Holding has an analysts' consensus of $13.39 which suggests that it could grow by 64.33%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.

Marchex has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marchex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Integral Ad Science Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marchex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Integral Ad Science Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marchex quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues of $134.1M. Marchex's net income of -$2M is lower than Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M. Notably, Marchex's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Integral Ad Science Holding's PE ratio is 28.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marchex is 1.85x versus 2.46x for Integral Ad Science Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National CineMedia has a net margin of -17.38% compared to Marchex's net margin of -87.97%. Marchex's return on equity of -16.35% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -4.67%.

Marchex has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.22%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of $7.13 which suggests that it could grow by 35.33%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than National CineMedia.

Marchex has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 2.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.285%.

Marchex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marchex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out -1.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marchex quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $34.9M. Marchex's net income of -$2M is higher than National CineMedia's net income of -$30.7M. Notably, Marchex's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marchex is 1.85x versus 2.11x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of -17.38% compared to Marchex's net margin of 8.23%. Marchex's return on equity of -16.35% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02%.

Marchex has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.22%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $86.35 which suggests that it could grow by 27.06%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

Marchex has a beta of 1.810, which suggesting that the stock is 80.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.022%.

Marchex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marchex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marchex quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $616M. Marchex's net income of -$2M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Marchex's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 82.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marchex is 1.85x versus 13.31x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.