APP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Samsara has a net margin of 43.65% compared to AppLovin's net margin of -3.24%. AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55% beat Samsara's return on equity of -15.9%.

AppLovin has a consensus price target of $433.38, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Samsara has an analysts' consensus of $47.06 which suggests that it could grow by 12.16%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than Samsara, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than Samsara.

AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsara has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AppLovin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsara offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AppLovin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsara pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AppLovin quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Samsara quarterly revenues of $346.3M. AppLovin's net income of $599.2M is higher than Samsara's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, AppLovin's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.84x while Samsara's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AppLovin is 22.41x versus 18.69x for Samsara. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 43.65% compared to AppLovin's net margin of 24.22%. AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

AppLovin has a consensus price target of $433.38, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $94.23 which suggests that it could fall by -14.92%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AppLovin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AppLovin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AppLovin quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. AppLovin's net income of $599.2M is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, AppLovin's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.84x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 480.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AppLovin is 22.41x versus 88.28x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 43.65% compared to AppLovin's net margin of 24.59%. AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

AppLovin has a consensus price target of $433.38, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $83.92 which suggests that it could grow by 48.64%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than AppLovin.

AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.891%.

AppLovin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AppLovin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AppLovin quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. AppLovin's net income of $599.2M is higher than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, AppLovin's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.84x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 72.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AppLovin is 22.41x versus 11.59x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 43.65% compared to AppLovin's net margin of -8.17%. AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

AppLovin has a consensus price target of $433.38, signalling upside risk potential of 42.81%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 96.42%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than AppLovin.

AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AppLovin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AppLovin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AppLovin quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. AppLovin's net income of $599.2M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, AppLovin's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.84x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AppLovin is 22.41x versus 2.39x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.