Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…
Sell
42
IAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.15
Seasonality move
:
-12.81%
Day range:
$7.97 - $8.16
52-week range:
$6.26 - $13.62
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
28.07x
P/S ratio:
2.46x
P/B ratio:
1.30x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-19.18%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$530.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.29
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$148.2M | $0.19 | 10.87% | 254.8% | $13.39 |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$6M | $0.12 | -24.13% | 4542.27% | $14.00 |
|
APP
AppLovin
|
$1.3B | $2.51 | 33.39% | 186.52% | $453.54 |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$12.9M | -$0.01 | 3% | -50% | $4.00 |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$66.6M | -$0.04 | 8.68% | -- | $7.13 |
|
TTD
The Trade Desk
|
$716.6M | $0.44 | 17.36% | 143.78% | $86.32 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$8.14 | $13.39 | $1.3B | 28.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.46x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$10.12 | $14.00 | $38.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.80x |
|
APP
AppLovin
|
$393.00 | $453.54 | $133B | 70.94x | $0.00 | 0% | 26.55x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$1.60 | $4.00 | $70.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.60x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$5.45 | $7.13 | $514M | 2.57x | $0.03 | 1.1% | 2.18x |
|
TTD
The Trade Desk
|
$75.22 | $86.32 | $37B | 91.73x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
1.36% | 1.389 | 1.08% | 3.32x |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
9.38% | 0.965 | 9.41% | 0.56x |
|
APP
AppLovin
|
86.57% | 6.259 | 4.14% | 1.51x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
-- | 1.983 | -- | 2.21x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
-- | 1.407 | -- | 2.16x |
|
TTD
The Trade Desk
|
-- | 3.161 | -- | 1.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$103.9M | $9.5M | 4.5% | 4.8% | 8.54% | -$7.4M |
|
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire
|
$4.3M | -$677K | -11.23% | -16.26% | -13.62% | $712K |
|
APP
AppLovin
|
$1.2B | $852.4M | 43.74% | 229.75% | 45.23% | $831.7M |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$7.2M | -$1.9M | -16.35% | -16.35% | -16.41% | -$2.9M |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$10.1M | -$23.9M | -4.58% | -4.67% | -87.39% | $5.3M |
|
TTD
The Trade Desk
|
$473.2M | $54.5M | 16.02% | 16.02% | 8.84% | $229.7M |
Integral Ad Science Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or ACCS?
ACCESS Newswire has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of 98.38%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat ACCESS Newswire's return on equity of -16.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B ACCSACCESS Newswire78.03% $1.40 $34.1M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 64.53%. On the other hand ACCESS Newswire has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.41%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than ACCESS Newswire, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than ACCESS Newswire.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 ACCSACCESS Newswire2 0 0 -
Is IAS or ACCS More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ACCESS Newswire has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ACCESS Newswire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ACCESS Newswire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or ACCS?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than ACCESS Newswire quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than ACCESS Newswire's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while ACCESS Newswire's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.46x versus 1.80x for ACCESS Newswire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.46x 28.07x $134.1M $8M ACCSACCESS Newswire1.80x -- $5.5M $5.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or APP?
AppLovin has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of 38.84%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 229.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B APPAppLovin81.72% $1.67 $4.3B -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or APP?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 64.53%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $453.54 which suggests that it could grow by 15.4%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than AppLovin.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 APPAppLovin17 5 1 -
Is IAS or APP More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or APP?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or APP?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $576.4M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 70.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.46x versus 26.55x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.46x 28.07x $134.1M $8M APPAppLovin26.55x 70.94x $1.5B $576.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or MCHX?
Marchex has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -17.38%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat Marchex's return on equity of -16.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B MCHXMarchex63.26% -$0.05 $31.4M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 64.53%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 MCHXMarchex1 0 0 -
Is IAS or MCHX More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.571%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than Marchex's net income of -$2M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.46x versus 1.60x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.46x 28.07x $134.1M $8M MCHXMarchex1.60x -- $11.4M -$2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or NCMI?
National CineMedia has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -87.97%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -4.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B NCMINational CineMedia28.94% -$0.32 $370.8M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 64.53%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of $7.13 which suggests that it could grow by 30.73%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than National CineMedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 NCMINational CineMedia2 1 0 -
Is IAS or NCMI More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 2.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.365%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out -1.35% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are larger than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $34.9M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is higher than National CineMedia's net income of -$30.7M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.46x versus 2.18x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.46x 28.07x $134.1M $8M NCMINational CineMedia2.18x 2.57x $34.9M -$30.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or TTD?
The Trade Desk has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of 8.23%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 4.8% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding77.53% $0.05 $1B TTDThe Trade Desk76.81% $0.10 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or TTD?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $13.39, signalling upside risk potential of 64.53%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $86.32 which suggests that it could grow by 14.76%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than The Trade Desk.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding8 6 0 TTDThe Trade Desk23 11 2 -
Is IAS or TTD More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.891%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or TTD?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or TTD?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $134.1M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $616M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $8M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 91.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 2.46x versus 14.73x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding2.46x 28.07x $134.1M $8M TTDThe Trade Desk14.73x 91.73x $616M $50.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.
Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31
Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.
