LFVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 13.42%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.73%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 534.92%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.729%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.43x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.04x versus 0.05x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChromaDex has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 24.65%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat ChromaDex's return on equity of 25.36%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.73%. On the other hand ChromaDex has an analysts' consensus of $8.82 which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than ChromaDex, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than ChromaDex.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChromaDex has a beta of 2.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.863%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. ChromaDex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. ChromaDex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than ChromaDex quarterly revenues of $29.1M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is lower than ChromaDex's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.43x while ChromaDex's PE ratio is 79.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.04x versus 6.19x for ChromaDex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 32.41%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.73%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $33.04 which suggests that it could grow by 7.77%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lifevantage's is not.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.43x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.04x versus 1.45x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -3.43%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.73%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.94%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.43x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.04x versus 1.16x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.