KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 14.02%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.6%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 45.85%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -19.61%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.037, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.349%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.53x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 12.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.23x versus 1.85x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hubbell has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 14.76%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 45.85%. On the other hand Hubbell has an analysts' consensus of $415.46 which suggests that it could grow by 15.46%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Hubbell.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.242%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are smaller than Hubbell quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is lower than Hubbell's net income of $197M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.53x while Hubbell's PE ratio is 25.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.23x versus 3.45x for Hubbell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of --. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 45.85%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.04%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Orbit International, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Orbit International.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.322, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.761%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.53x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.23x versus 0.65x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of -1.28%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -15.6%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 45.85%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.85%. Given that RF Industries has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Kimball Electronics.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 0.832, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.84%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $19.2M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$245K. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.53x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.23x versus 0.58x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.