HUBB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 0.84%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.27% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 2.39%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $470.94, signalling upside risk potential of 6.9%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.86%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.493%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 32.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $374.3M. Hubbell's net income of $219.4M is higher than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.74x while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 36.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.29x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 10.24%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.27% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $470.94, signalling upside risk potential of 6.9%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.11%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.42%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hubbell pays 32.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $983.8M. Hubbell's net income of $219.4M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.74x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 2.64x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Hubbell's net margin of --. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.27% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $470.94, signalling upside risk potential of 6.9%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.45%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than Orbit International, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than Orbit International.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.586%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Orbit International offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hubbell pays 32.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Hubbell's net income of $219.4M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.74x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.86x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Hubbell's net margin of -4.19%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.27% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -19.23%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $470.94, signalling upside risk potential of 6.9%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.22%. Given that RF Industries has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.273%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 32.31% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Hubbell's net income of $219.4M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$705K. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.74x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.67x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.