INTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duolingo has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 12.13%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Duolingo's return on equity of 12.15%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of $72.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Duolingo has an analysts' consensus of $347.91 which suggests that it could grow by 1.79%. Given that Intapp has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Intapp is more attractive than Duolingo.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duolingo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duolingo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Duolingo quarterly revenues of $192.6M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than Duolingo's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Duolingo's PE ratio is 186.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 10.85x versus 23.54x for Duolingo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fair Isaac has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 29.9%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Fair Isaac's return on equity of --.

Intapp has a consensus price target of $72.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Fair Isaac has an analysts' consensus of $2,164.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.9%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.699%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fair Isaac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fair Isaac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Fair Isaac quarterly revenues of $453.8M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fair Isaac's PE ratio is 96.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 10.85x versus 28.76x for Fair Isaac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of 37.61%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of $72.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.46 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.413%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 10.85x versus 12.48x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -3.81% compared to Intapp's net margin of -34.42%. Intapp's return on equity of -5.44% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

Intapp has a consensus price target of $72.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $187.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.87%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Intapp.

Intapp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intapp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intapp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intapp quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Intapp's net income of -$4.5M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, Intapp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intapp is 10.85x versus 16.33x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.