WK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 11.89%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $112.68, signalling upside risk potential of 69.67%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $700.34 which suggests that it could grow by 19.3%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than Intuit.

Workiva has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.578%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 54.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 4.98x versus 9.69x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 18.77%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $112.68, signalling upside risk potential of 69.67%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $234.22 which suggests that it could grow by 47.62%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Workiva has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.862%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are smaller than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $255.8M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 45.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 4.98x versus 9.47x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 10.27%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.31%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $112.68, signalling upside risk potential of 69.67%. On the other hand SPS Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $201.75 which suggests that it could grow by 53.2%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than SPS Commerce, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than SPS Commerce.

Workiva has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.275%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPS Commerce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPS Commerce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are larger than SPS Commerce quarterly revenues of $170.9M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than SPS Commerce's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPS Commerce's PE ratio is 64.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 4.98x versus 7.82x for SPS Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertex has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of -37.99%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Vertex's return on equity of -22.45%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $112.68, signalling upside risk potential of 69.67%. On the other hand Vertex has an analysts' consensus of $48.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.69%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than Vertex, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than Vertex.

Workiva has a beta of 1.021, which suggesting that the stock is 2.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertex has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vertex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are larger than Vertex quarterly revenues of $178.5M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is higher than Vertex's net income of -$67.8M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vertex's PE ratio is 182.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 4.98x versus 9.24x for Vertex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.