INHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -58.6% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of -0.63%. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -123.3% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inno Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Inno Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $490K, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Inno Holdings's net income of -$287.2K is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 10.74x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -58.6% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of --. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -123.3% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $490K, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings's net income of -$287.2K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 10.74x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of -58.6% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of 3.09%. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -123.3% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.47%.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $42.93 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that United States Steel has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe United States Steel is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.079%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $490K, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Inno Holdings's net income of -$287.2K is lower than United States Steel's net income of $119M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Steel's PE ratio is 21.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 10.74x versus 0.50x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -58.6% compared to Inno Holdings's net margin of --. Inno Holdings's return on equity of -123.3% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Inno Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Inno Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Inno Holdings.

Inno Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Inno Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inno Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inno Holdings quarterly revenues are $490K, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Inno Holdings's net income of -$287.2K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Inno Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inno Holdings is 10.74x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.