GCMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 0.37% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 99.99%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -1.63%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.729, which suggesting that the stock is 27.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.035%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but GCM Grosvenor's is not.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $125.1M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $463K is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.29x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.26x versus 8.42x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 0.37% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 91.13%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.81%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.729, which suggesting that the stock is 27.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.032%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $125.1M, which are larger than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $463K is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.29x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.26x versus 12.16x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 0.37% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 95.41%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.729, which suggesting that the stock is 27.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.59900000000001%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $125.1M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $463K is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.29x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.26x versus 9.15x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 0.37% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 90.2%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $14.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -1.86%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.729, which suggesting that the stock is 27.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.353%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $125.1M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $463K is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 85.29x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 110.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.26x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.