GCMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 4.48% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 99.99%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but GCM Grosvenor's is not.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $170.1M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $7.6M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 421.00x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.61x versus 7.55x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 4.48% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 35.17%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.17%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $139.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.87%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than GCM Grosvenor, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than GCM Grosvenor.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.408%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but GCM Grosvenor's is not.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $170.1M, which are smaller than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.2B. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $7.6M is lower than KKR &'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 421.00x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.61x versus 5.04x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 4.48% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 90.38%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.03 which suggests that it could grow by 17.61%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than GCM Grosvenor, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than GCM Grosvenor.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.40500000000001%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $170.1M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $7.6M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 421.00x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 9.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.61x versus 8.46x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 4.48% compared to GCM Grosvenor's net margin of 90.2%. GCM Grosvenor's return on equity of -- beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

GCM Grosvenor has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.10 which suggests that it could grow by 5.7%. Given that GCM Grosvenor has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe GCM Grosvenor is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

GCM Grosvenor has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

GCM Grosvenor has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 15.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. GCM Grosvenor pays 109.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GCM Grosvenor quarterly revenues are $170.1M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. GCM Grosvenor's net income of $7.6M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, GCM Grosvenor's price-to-earnings ratio is 421.00x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 102.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCM Grosvenor is 4.61x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.