FCUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of -6910.88% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of -5.67%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.43%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $180.43 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of -0.316, which suggesting that the stock is 131.617% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.72%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $74.2K, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M is higher than Keysight Technologies's net income of -$73M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 47.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 50.19x versus 5.85x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of -6910.88% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of 5.93%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $133.33 which suggests that it could fall by -4.02%. Given that Mesa Laboratories has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Mesa Laboratories is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of -0.316, which suggesting that the stock is 131.617% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.046%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $74.2K, which are smaller than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $57.8M. Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M is lower than Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 50.19x versus 3.30x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo has a net margin of -6910.88% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of -1.67%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24% beat Qorvo's return on equity of -3.94%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qorvo has an analysts' consensus of $93.23 which suggests that it could grow by 26.62%. Given that Qorvo has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Qorvo is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of -0.316, which suggesting that the stock is 131.617% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.874%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qorvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $74.2K, which are smaller than Qorvo quarterly revenues of $1B. Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M is higher than Qorvo's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qorvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 50.19x versus 1.80x for Qorvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of -6910.88% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of 6.6%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24% beat Sono-Tek's return on equity of 9.33%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sono-Tek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 128.08%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of -0.316, which suggesting that the stock is 131.617% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.669%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sono-Tek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $74.2K, which are smaller than Sono-Tek quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M is higher than Sono-Tek's net income of $340.7K. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sono-Tek's PE ratio is 46.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 50.19x versus 3.22x for Sono-Tek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.