SOTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Focus Universal has a net margin of 5.28% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of -657.74%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 6.6% beat Focus Universal's return on equity of -111.52%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 107.81%. On the other hand Focus Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Focus Universal has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.875%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Focus Universal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Focus Universal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5.2M, which are larger than Focus Universal quarterly revenues of $190.3K. Sono-Tek's net income of $274.2K is higher than Focus Universal's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Focus Universal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.11x versus 75.47x for Focus Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 5.28% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of 13.02%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 6.6% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 107.81%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $179.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.426%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5.2M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sono-Tek's net income of $274.2K is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 47.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.11x versus 5.73x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of 5.28% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of -2.67%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 6.6% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -122.79%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 107.81%. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $141.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.96%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Mesa Laboratories, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Mesa Laboratories.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.358%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5.2M, which are smaller than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Sono-Tek's net income of $274.2K is higher than Mesa Laboratories's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.11x versus 2.74x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo has a net margin of 5.28% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of 3.61%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 6.6% beat Qorvo's return on equity of 1.61%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 107.81%. On the other hand Qorvo has an analysts' consensus of $81.79 which suggests that it could grow by 2.96%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Qorvo, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Qorvo.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo has a beta of 1.381, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.058%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qorvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5.2M, which are smaller than Qorvo quarterly revenues of $869.5M. Sono-Tek's net income of $274.2K is lower than Qorvo's net income of $31.4M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Qorvo's PE ratio is 135.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.11x versus 2.03x for Qorvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.