DUOL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intapp has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Duolingo's net margin of -3.81%. Duolingo's return on equity of 12.15% beat Intapp's return on equity of -5.44%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $347.91, signalling upside risk potential of 1.79%. On the other hand Intapp has an analysts' consensus of $72.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.66%. Given that Intapp has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Intapp is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intapp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intapp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intapp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $192.6M, which are larger than Intapp quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Duolingo's net income of $23.4M is higher than Intapp's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 186.78x while Intapp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 23.54x versus 10.85x for Intapp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Duolingo's net margin of -9.14%. Duolingo's return on equity of 12.15% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $347.91, signalling upside risk potential of 1.79%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 113.96%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $192.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Duolingo's net income of $23.4M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 186.78x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 23.54x versus 0.79x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Duolingo's net margin of -6.7%. Duolingo's return on equity of 12.15% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $347.91, signalling upside risk potential of 1.79%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.23%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $192.6M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Duolingo's net income of $23.4M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 186.78x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 23.54x versus 1.17x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Duolingo's net margin of 23.35%. Duolingo's return on equity of 12.15% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34%.

Duolingo has a consensus price target of $347.91, signalling upside risk potential of 1.79%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $89.17 which suggests that it could grow by 30.03%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Duolingo, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Duolingo.

Duolingo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.503%.

Duolingo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Duolingo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Duolingo quarterly revenues are $192.6M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Duolingo's net income of $23.4M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Duolingo's price-to-earnings ratio is 186.78x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 34.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Duolingo is 23.54x versus 3.48x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.