CVGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -3528.43%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $169.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.06x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -7.21%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04% beat Monro's return on equity of -0.8%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Monro.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.505%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 7.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $169.8M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $295M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M is higher than Monro's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Monro's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.06x versus 0.38x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -0.37%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -7.28%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.39%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.565%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $169.8M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $193.1M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$722K. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.06x versus 0.28x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of 0.13%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04% beat Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 26.12%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Douglas Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.505%.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Douglas Dynamics offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics pays out 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues are $169.8M, which are larger than Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues of $115.1M. Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Douglas Dynamics's net income of $148K. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Douglas Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group is 0.06x versus 1.14x for Douglas Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.