CBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China TMK Battery Systems has a net margin of -4.52% compared to CBAK Energy Technology's net margin of --. CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3% beat China TMK Battery Systems's return on equity of --.

CBAK Energy Technology has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.97%. On the other hand China TMK Battery Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than China TMK Battery Systems, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than China TMK Battery Systems.

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.252% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China TMK Battery Systems has a beta of -0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.749%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China TMK Battery Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China TMK Battery Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues are $34.9M, which are larger than China TMK Battery Systems quarterly revenues of --. CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M is higher than China TMK Battery Systems's net income of --. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,173.47x while China TMK Battery Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology is 0.71x versus -- for China TMK Battery Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -4.52% compared to CBAK Energy Technology's net margin of 9.9%. CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.97%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 21.78%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than EnerSys.

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.252% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.885%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. CBAK Energy Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues are $34.9M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $974.8M. CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $96.5M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,173.47x while EnerSys's PE ratio is 9.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology is 0.71x versus 0.97x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -4.52% compared to CBAK Energy Technology's net margin of -11.58%. CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.97%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could grow by 226.92%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology.

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.252% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.245%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues are $34.9M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.7M. CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,173.47x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology is 0.71x versus 0.41x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of -4.52% compared to CBAK Energy Technology's net margin of -71.96%. CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.97%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 157.73%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology.

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.252% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of -0.242, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.249%.

CBAK Energy Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues are $34.9M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $2M. CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M is lower than NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,173.47x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology is 0.71x versus 22.81x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.