NEOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amprius Technologies has a net margin of -71.96% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -83.05%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1% beat Amprius Technologies's return on equity of -68.79%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 114.9%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 250.55%. Given that Amprius Technologies has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Amprius Technologies is more attractive than NeoVolta.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Amprius Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.3M. NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Amprius Technologies's net income of -$9.4M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 27.36x versus 9.07x for Amprius Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -71.96% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of 9.9%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 114.9%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $109.27 which suggests that it could grow by 36.18%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.664%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $974.8M. NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $96.5M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 27.36x versus 0.90x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -71.96% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -11.58%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 114.9%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could grow by 198.25%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than NeoVolta.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.307%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.7M. NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 27.36x versus 0.45x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of -71.96% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -9.07%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 114.9%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.17%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than Tecogen.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.531%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 27.36x versus 4.83x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.