NEOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amprius Technologies has a net margin of -163.41% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -138.13%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85% beat Amprius Technologies's return on equity of -70.1%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.76%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.52%. Given that Amprius Technologies has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Amprius Technologies is more attractive than NeoVolta.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $590.2K, which are smaller than Amprius Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.9M. NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K is higher than Amprius Technologies's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 61.60x versus 16.98x for Amprius Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -163.41% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of 9.31%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.76%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $115.20 which suggests that it could grow by 24.89%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.217, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.682%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $590.2K, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $883.7M. NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K is lower than EnerSys's net income of $82.3M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 61.60x versus 1.08x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -163.41% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -18.26%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.76%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 251.76%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than NeoVolta.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.274%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $590.2K, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.5M. NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 61.60x versus 0.51x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expion360 has a net margin of -163.41% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -634.38%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85% beat Expion360's return on equity of -368.36%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.76%. On the other hand Expion360 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.01%. Given that Expion360 has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Expion360 is more attractive than NeoVolta.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expion360 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expion360 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expion360 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $590.2K, which are smaller than Expion360 quarterly revenues of $1.4M. NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K is higher than Expion360's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expion360's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 61.60x versus 0.02x for Expion360. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.