ENS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 14.01%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 33.86%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $135.29 which suggests that it could grow by 29.55%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.506%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.2B. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $585M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 24.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.99x versus 3.41x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -11.21%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 33.86%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.20 which suggests that it could grow by 237.66%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.531%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.8M. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.99x versus 0.42x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 14.68%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.35%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 33.86%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $390.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.98%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.597, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.718%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $394.4M. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $57.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 45.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.99x versus 6.16x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 12.67% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 2.82%. EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.09%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $115.15, signalling upside risk potential of 33.86%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $161.91 which suggests that it could grow by 51.03%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.073%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. EnerSys pays 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $906.2M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. EnerSys's net income of $114.8M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $41.2M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 36.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.99x versus 1.18x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.