BWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eHealth has a net margin of 3.41% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of 1.72%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -3.09% beat eHealth's return on equity of 4.17%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 138.1%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.531%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are larger than eHealth quarterly revenues of $113.1M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of $13.9M is higher than eHealth's net income of $2M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.80x versus 0.23x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hippo Holdings has a net margin of 3.41% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -43.25%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -3.09% beat Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -15.42%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand Hippo Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.62%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hippo Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Hippo Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are larger than Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.3M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of $13.9M is higher than Hippo Holdings's net income of -$47.7M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hippo Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.80x versus 1.83x for Hippo Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 3.41% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of 7.69%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -3.09% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.67%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.731%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $50.5M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of $13.9M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 9.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.80x versus 1.15x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 3.41% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -41%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -3.09% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -205.56%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.12%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9984.75%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.867%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $4.2M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of $13.9M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.80x versus 0.14x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.