BWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eHealth has a net margin of -6.23% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of 30.93%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -2.37% beat eHealth's return on equity of 1.6%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $48.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.63 which suggests that it could grow by 79.17%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.024%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $323.4M, which are larger than eHealth quarterly revenues of $315.2M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of -$20.2M is lower than eHealth's net income of $97.5M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.95x versus 0.33x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of -6.23% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of 15.82%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -2.37% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $48.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $118.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.55%. Given that The Baldwin Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe The Baldwin Insurance Group is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.556%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $323.4M, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $93.9M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 96.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.95x versus 13.52x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of -6.23% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of 12.92%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -2.37% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $48.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.08%. Given that The Baldwin Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe The Baldwin Insurance Group is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.89%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $323.4M, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.95x versus 1.32x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of -6.23% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -42.41%. The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -2.37% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -254.59%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $48.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.84%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11682.18%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.336% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.907%.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $323.4M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $3.3M. The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, The Baldwin Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Baldwin Insurance Group is 1.95x versus 0.08x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.