EHTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoHealth has a net margin of 1.72% compared to eHealth's net margin of -2%. eHealth's return on equity of 4.17% beat GoHealth's return on equity of 0.44%.

eHealth has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.9%. On the other hand GoHealth has an analysts' consensus of $21.60 which suggests that it could grow by 292.02%. Given that GoHealth has higher upside potential than eHealth, analysts believe GoHealth is more attractive than eHealth.

eHealth has a beta of 1.113, which suggesting that the stock is 11.29% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoHealth has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

eHealth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. eHealth pays 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. GoHealth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

eHealth quarterly revenues are $113.1M, which are smaller than GoHealth quarterly revenues of $221M. eHealth's net income of $2M is higher than GoHealth's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, eHealth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for eHealth is 0.22x versus 0.07x for GoHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 1.72% compared to eHealth's net margin of 3.1%. eHealth's return on equity of 4.17% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38%.

eHealth has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.9%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $116.11 which suggests that it could grow by 7.25%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

eHealth has a beta of 1.113, which suggesting that the stock is 11.29% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.901%.

eHealth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. eHealth pays 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

eHealth quarterly revenues are $113.1M, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $75.6M. eHealth's net income of $2M is lower than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $2.3M. Notably, eHealth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 90.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for eHealth is 0.22x versus 11.66x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 1.72% compared to eHealth's net margin of 7.69%. eHealth's return on equity of 4.17% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5%.

eHealth has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.9%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.97%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

eHealth has a beta of 1.113, which suggesting that the stock is 11.29% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.519%.

eHealth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. eHealth pays 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

eHealth quarterly revenues are $113.1M, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $50.5M. eHealth's net income of $2M is lower than Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M. Notably, eHealth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 10.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for eHealth is 0.22x versus 1.25x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 1.72% compared to eHealth's net margin of -41%. eHealth's return on equity of 4.17% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -205.56%.

eHealth has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.9%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8714.82%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than eHealth, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than eHealth.

eHealth has a beta of 1.113, which suggesting that the stock is 11.29% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.923%.

eHealth has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. eHealth pays 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

eHealth quarterly revenues are $113.1M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $4.2M. eHealth's net income of $2M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, eHealth's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for eHealth is 0.22x versus 0.16x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.