GSHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 10.43%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.19%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $118.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6.55%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goosehead Insurance has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Goosehead Insurance is more attractive than CorVel.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.112%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $93.9M, which are smaller than CorVel quarterly revenues of $228M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M is lower than CorVel's net income of $23.8M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.55x while CorVel's PE ratio is 67.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 13.52x versus 6.86x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 30.93%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38% beat eHealth's return on equity of 1.6%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $118.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6.55%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.63 which suggests that it could grow by 79.17%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.024%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $93.9M, which are smaller than eHealth quarterly revenues of $315.2M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M is lower than eHealth's net income of $97.5M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.55x while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 13.52x versus 0.33x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 12.92%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $118.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6.55%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.08%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.89%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $93.9M, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.55x while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 13.52x versus 1.32x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 15.82% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of -42.41%. Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -254.59%.

Goosehead Insurance has a consensus price target of $118.30, signalling upside risk potential of 6.55%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11682.18%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.556% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.907%.

Goosehead Insurance has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues are $93.9M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.55x while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance is 13.52x versus 0.08x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.