HIPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 44.89%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.93%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.925%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 35.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.65x versus 5.73x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 6.77%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.93%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -24.88%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Root's PE ratio is 75.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.65x versus 1.74x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 4.73%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.93%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 18.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.65x versus 1.94x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.93%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 42.2%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Hippo Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Hippo Holdings.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.65x versus 1.22x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.