BCOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of -5.92% compared to Brightcove's net margin of -9.14%. Brightcove's return on equity of -9.65% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Brightcove has a consensus price target of $4.45, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 113.44%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Brightcove, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Brightcove.

Brightcove has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Brightcove has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brightcove pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brightcove quarterly revenues are $50M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Brightcove's net income of -$3M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Brightcove's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brightcove is 0.98x versus 0.79x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -5.92% compared to Brightcove's net margin of -6.7%. Brightcove's return on equity of -9.65% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Brightcove has a consensus price target of $4.45, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.79%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Brightcove, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Brightcove.

Brightcove has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Brightcove has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brightcove pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brightcove quarterly revenues are $50M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Brightcove's net income of -$3M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Brightcove's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brightcove is 0.98x versus 1.22x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of -5.92% compared to Brightcove's net margin of -293.07%. Brightcove's return on equity of -9.65% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

Brightcove has a consensus price target of $4.45, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of $522.23 which suggests that it could grow by 31.71%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Brightcove, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Brightcove.

Brightcove has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.843%.

Brightcove has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brightcove pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brightcove quarterly revenues are $50M, which are smaller than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Brightcove's net income of -$3M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, Brightcove's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brightcove is 0.98x versus 164.43x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -5.92% compared to Brightcove's net margin of -34.42%. Brightcove's return on equity of -9.65% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

Brightcove has a consensus price target of $4.45, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $187.53 which suggests that it could grow by 9.8%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Brightcove, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Brightcove.

Brightcove has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brightcove has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brightcove pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brightcove quarterly revenues are $50M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Brightcove's net income of -$3M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, Brightcove's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brightcove is 0.98x versus 16.64x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.