AFRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lyft has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of 0.18%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Lyft's return on equity of 8.54%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.66, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Lyft has an analysts' consensus of $16.87 which suggests that it could fall by -0.93%. Given that Affirm Holdings has higher upside potential than Lyft, analysts believe Affirm Holdings is more attractive than Lyft.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.08%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are smaller than Lyft quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Lyft's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lyft's PE ratio is 113.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 5.93x versus 1.20x for Lyft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Olo has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of 2.24%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Olo's return on equity of 0.49%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.66, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Olo has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.06%. Given that Affirm Holdings has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe Affirm Holdings is more attractive than Olo.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Olo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Olo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Olo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than Olo quarterly revenues of $80.7M. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Olo's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Olo's PE ratio is 485.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 5.93x versus 5.48x for Olo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of 2.79%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.66, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.58 which suggests that it could grow by 50.96%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than Affirm Holdings.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pagaya Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues of $282.7M. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is lower than Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pagaya Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 5.93x versus 1.05x for Pagaya Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telos has a net margin of 0.36% compared to Affirm Holdings's net margin of -28.1%. Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25% beat Telos's return on equity of -39.16%.

Affirm Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.66, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Telos has an analysts' consensus of $3.85 which suggests that it could grow by 40.26%. Given that Telos has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, analysts believe Telos is more attractive than Affirm Holdings.

Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues are $783.1M, which are larger than Telos quarterly revenues of $30.6M. Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Telos's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Affirm Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Telos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings is 5.93x versus 1.82x for Telos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.