ACGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 12.5% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 4.96%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.99% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 20.68%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.42 which suggests that it could grow by 16.19%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Arch Capital Group's net income of $574M is higher than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.01x versus 0.84x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 12.5% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 5.82%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.99% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 20.68%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.86%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $574M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 5.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.01x versus 0.88x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 12.5% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of -570.56%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.99% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 20.68%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.48%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Arch Capital Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Arch Capital Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $574M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.01x versus 1.45x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 12.5% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 4.92%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.99% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $111.86, signalling upside risk potential of 20.68%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $274.55 which suggests that it could grow by 10.64%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.548%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Arch Capital Group's net income of $574M is higher than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.50x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 2.01x versus 1.00x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.