RNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 54.15%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $277.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.71%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.128%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.99x versus 4.83x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 32.78%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 8.44%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $277.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.15%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.743%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $180M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $59M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 10.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.99x versus 4.43x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hiscox has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 18.17%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $277.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Hiscox.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.007%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 20.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 9.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.99x versus 1.57x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 8.45%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 6.95%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $277.82, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.78%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than SiriusPoint, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than SiriusPoint.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.099%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $729.4M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $61.6M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 20.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.99x versus 1.17x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.