RNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 67.86%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 13.05%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $290.27, signalling upside risk potential of 12.75%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.727%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 9.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $252M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Assured Guaranty's net income of $171M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.71x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 7.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.05x versus 5.49x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 40.78%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $290.27, signalling upside risk potential of 12.75%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.42%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.485%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.71x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.05x versus 3.72x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hiscox has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 22.74%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $290.27, signalling upside risk potential of 12.75%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Hiscox.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.156%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 17.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.71x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.05x versus 1.35x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 1.52%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 12.28%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $290.27, signalling upside risk potential of 12.75%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.28%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than SiriusPoint, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than SiriusPoint.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.98%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 4.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $559.2M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $8.5M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.71x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 9.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.05x versus 1.01x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.